`wasi-sdk-20` pre-release can be used to avoid building `wasi-libc` to enable threads.
It's not possible to use `wasi-sdk-20` pre-release on Ubuntu 20.04 because of
incompatibility with the glibc version:
```bash
/opt/wasi-sdk/bin/clang: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.34' not found
(required by /opt/wasi-sdk/bin/clang)
```
Support collecting code coverage with wamr-test-suites script by using
lcov and genhtml tools, eg.:
cd tests/wamr-test-suites
./test_wamr.sh -s spec -b -P -C
The default code coverage and html files are generated at:
tests/wamr-test-suites/workspace/wamr.lcov
tests/wamr-test-suites/workspace/wamr-lcov.zip
And update wamr-test-suites scripts to support testing GC spec cases to
avoid frequent synchronization conflicts between branch main and dev/gc.
Raising "wasi proc exit" exception, spreading it to other threads and then
clearing it in all threads may result in unexpected behavior: the sub thread
may end first, handle the "wasi proc exit" exception and clear exceptions
of other threads, including the main thread. And when main thread's
exception is cleared, it may continue to run and throw "unreachable"
exception. This also leads to some assertion failed.
Ignore exception spreading for "wasi proc exit" and don't clear exception
of other threads to resolve the issue.
And add suspend flag check after atomic wait since the atomic wait may
be notified by other thread when exception occurs.
The example wasn't fully implemented the intention - it didn't work as
expected when the trap/proc_exit was executed on the main thread,
because main thread never waited for all the threads to start.
This syscall doesn't need allocating stack or TLS and it's expected from the application
to do that instead. E.g. WASI-libc already does this for `pthread_create`.
Also fix some of the examples to allocate memory for stack and not use stack before
the stack pointer is set to a correct value.
For now this implementation uses thread manager.
Not sure whether thread manager is needed in that case. In the future there'll be likely another syscall added (for pthread_exit) and for that we might need some kind of thread management - with that in mind, we keep thread manager for now and will refactor this later if needed.
