Make it a Bytecode Alliance project

This commit is contained in:
Till Schneidereit 2019-11-12 16:52:57 +01:00
parent be15c08cf3
commit 45f0caebd0
5 changed files with 189 additions and 49 deletions

View File

@ -1,23 +1,14 @@
+++
version = "1.4"
aliases = ["/version/1/4"]
+++
# Contributor Covenant Code of Conduct
*Note*: this Code of Conduct pertains to individuals' behavior. Please also see the [Organizational Code of Conduct][OCoC].
## Our Pledge
In the interest of fostering an open and welcoming environment, we as
contributors and maintainers pledge to make participation in our project and
our community a harassment-free experience for everyone, regardless of age, body
size, disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression,
level of experience, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal
appearance, race, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
In the interest of fostering an open and welcoming environment, we as contributors and maintainers pledge to making participation in our project and our community a harassment-free experience for everyone, regardless of age, body size, disability, ethnicity, gender identity and expression, level of experience, nationality, personal appearance, race, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
## Our Standards
Examples of behavior that contributes to creating a positive environment
include:
Examples of behavior that contributes to creating a positive environment include:
* Using welcoming and inclusive language
* Being respectful of differing viewpoints and experiences
@ -27,55 +18,32 @@ include:
Examples of unacceptable behavior by participants include:
* The use of sexualized language or imagery and unwelcome sexual attention or
advances
* The use of sexualized language or imagery and unwelcome sexual attention or advances
* Trolling, insulting/derogatory comments, and personal or political attacks
* Public or private harassment
* Publishing others' private information, such as a physical or electronic
address, without explicit permission
* Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a
professional setting
* Publishing others' private information, such as a physical or electronic address, without explicit permission
* Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a professional setting
## Our Responsibilities
Project maintainers are responsible for clarifying the standards of acceptable
behavior and are expected to take appropriate and fair corrective action in
response to any instances of unacceptable behavior.
Project maintainers are responsible for clarifying the standards of acceptable behavior and are expected to take appropriate and fair corrective action in response to any instances of unacceptable behavior.
Project maintainers have the right and responsibility to remove, edit, or
reject comments, commits, code, wiki edits, issues, and other contributions
that are not aligned to this Code of Conduct, or to ban temporarily or
permanently any contributor for other behaviors that they deem inappropriate,
threatening, offensive, or harmful.
Project maintainers have the right and responsibility to remove, edit, or reject comments, commits, code, wiki edits, issues, and other contributions that are not aligned to this Code of Conduct, or to ban temporarily or permanently any contributor for other behaviors that they deem inappropriate, threatening, offensive, or harmful.
## Scope
This Code of Conduct applies within all project spaces, and it also applies when
an individual is representing the project or its community in public spaces.
Examples of representing a project or community include using an official
project e-mail address, posting via an official social media account, or acting
as an appointed representative at an online or offline event. Representation of
a project may be further defined and clarified by project maintainers.
This Code of Conduct applies both within project spaces and in public spaces when an individual is representing the project or its community. Examples of representing a project or community include using an official project e-mail address, posting via an official social media account, or acting as an appointed representative at an online or offline event. Representation of a project may be further defined and clarified by project maintainers.
## Enforcement
Instances of abusive, harassing, or otherwise unacceptable behavior may be
reported by contacting the project team at otc.community.care@intel.com. All
complaints will be reviewed and investigated and will result in a response that
is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is
obligated to maintain confidentiality with regard to the reporter of an incident.
Further details of specific enforcement policies may be posted separately.
Instances of abusive, harassing, or otherwise unacceptable behavior may be reported by contacting the Bytecode Alliance CoC team at [report@bytecodealliance.org](mailto:report@bytecodealliance.org). The CoC team will review and investigate all complaints, and will respond in a way that it deems appropriate to the circumstances. The CoC team is obligated to maintain confidentiality with regard to the reporter of an incident. Further details of specific enforcement policies may be posted separately.
Project maintainers who do not follow or enforce the Code of Conduct in good
faith may face temporary or permanent repercussions as determined by other
members of the project's leadership.
Project maintainers who do not follow or enforce the Code of Conduct in good faith may face temporary or permanent repercussions as determined by other members of the Bytecode Alliance's leadership.
## Attribution
This Code of Conduct is adapted from the [Contributor Covenant][homepage], version 1.4,
available at https://www.contributor-covenant.org/version/1/4/code-of-conduct.html
This Code of Conduct is adapted from the [Contributor Covenant][homepage], version 1.4, available at [http://contributor-covenant.org/version/1/4][version]
[OCoC]: ORG_CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
[homepage]: https://www.contributor-covenant.org
For answers to common questions about this code of conduct, see
https://www.contributor-covenant.org/faq
[version]: https://www.contributor-covenant.org/version/1/4/

View File

@ -36,5 +36,4 @@ We use GitHub issues to track public bugs. Report a bug by [open a new issue](ht
Code of Conduct
===============
This project is governed by the [Contributor Covenant](CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md).
All contributors and participants agree to abide by its terms.
WAMR is a [Bytecode Alliance](https://bytecodealliance.org/) project, and follows the Bytecode Alliance's [Code of Conduct](CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md) and [Organizational Code of Conduct](ORG_CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md).

139
ORG_CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,139 @@
# Bytecode Alliance Organizational Code of Conduct (OCoC)
*Note*: this Code of Conduct pertains to organizations' behavior. Please also see the [Individual Code of Conduct](CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md).
## Preamble
The Bytecode Alliance (BA) welcomes involvement from organizations,
including commercial organizations. This document is an
*organizational* code of conduct, intended particularly to provide
guidance to commercial organizations. It is distinct from the
[Individual Code of Conduct (ICoC)](CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md), and does not
replace the ICoC. This OCoC applies to any group of people acting in
concert as a BA member or as a participant in BA activities, whether
or not that group is formally incorporated in some jurisdiction.
The code of conduct described below is not a set of rigid rules, and
we did not write it to encompass every conceivable scenario that might
arise. For example, it is theoretically possible there would be times
when asserting patents is in the best interest of the BA community as
a whole. In such instances, consult with the BA, strive for
consensus, and interpret these rules with an intent that is generous
to the community the BA serves.
While we may revise these guidelines from time to time based on
real-world experience, overall they are based on a simple principle:
*Bytecode Alliance members should observe the distinction between
public community functions and private functions — especially
commercial ones — and should ensure that the latter support, or at
least do not harm, the former.*
## Guidelines
* **Do not cause confusion about Wasm standards or interoperability.**
Having an interoperable WebAssembly core is a high priority for
the BA, and members should strive to preserve that core. It is fine
to develop additional non-standard features or APIs, but they
should always be clearly distinguished from the core interoperable
Wasm.
Treat the WebAssembly name and any BA-associated names with
respect, and follow BA trademark and branding guidelines. If you
distribute a customized version of software originally produced by
the BA, or if you build a product or service using BA-derived
software, use names that clearly distinguish your work from the
original. (You should still provide proper attribution to the
original, of course, wherever such attribution would normally be
given.)
Further, do not use the WebAssembly name or BA-associated names in
other public namespaces in ways that could cause confusion, e.g.,
in company names, names of commercial service offerings, domain
names, publicly-visible social media accounts or online service
accounts, etc. It may sometimes be reasonable, however, to
register such a name in a new namespace and then immediately donate
control of that account to the BA, because that would help the project
maintain its identity.
* **Do not restrict contributors.** If your company requires
employees or contractors to sign non-compete agreements, those
agreements must not prevent people from participating in the BA or
contributing to related projects.
This does not mean that all non-compete agreements are incompatible
with this code of conduct. For example, a company may restrict an
employee's ability to solicit the company's customers. However, an
agreement must not block any form of technical or social
participation in BA activities, including but not limited to the
implementation of particular features.
The accumulation of experience and expertise in individual persons,
who are ultimately free to direct their energy and attention as
they decide, is one of the most important drivers of progress in
open source projects. A company that limits this freedom may hinder
the success of the BA's efforts.
* **Do not use patents as offensive weapons.** If any BA participant
prevents the adoption or development of BA technologies by
asserting its patents, that undermines the purpose of the
coalition. The collaboration fostered by the BA cannot include
members who act to undermine its work.
* **Practice responsible disclosure** for security vulnerabilities.
Use designated, non-public reporting channels to disclose technical
vulnerabilities, and give the project a reasonable period to
respond, remediate, and patch.
Vulnerability reporters may patch their company's own offerings, as
long as that patching does not significantly delay the reporting of
the vulnerability. Vulnerability information should never be used
for unilateral commercial advantage. Vendors may legitimately
compete on the speed and reliability with which they deploy
security fixes, but withholding vulnerability information damages
everyone in the long run by risking harm to the BA project's
reputation and to the security of all users.
* **Respect the letter and spirit of open source practice.** While
there is not space to list here all possible aspects of standard
open source practice, some examples will help show what we mean:
* Abide by all applicable open source license terms. Do not engage
in copyright violation or misattribution of any kind.
* Do not claim others' ideas or designs as your own.
* When others engage in publicly visible work (e.g., an upcoming
demo that is coordinated in a public issue tracker), do not
unilaterally announce early releases or early demonstrations of
that work ahead of their schedule in order to secure private
advantage (such as marketplace advantage) for yourself.
The BA reserves the right to determine what constitutes good open
source practices and to take action as it deems appropriate to
encourage, and if necessary enforce, such practices.
## Enforcement
Instances of organizational behavior in violation of the OCoC may
be reported by contacting the Bytecode Alliance CoC team at
[report@bytecodealliance.org](mailto:report@bytecodealliance.org). The
CoC team will review and investigate all complaints, and will respond
in a way that it deems appropriate to the circumstances. The CoC team
is obligated to maintain confidentiality with regard to the reporter of
an incident. Further details of specific enforcement policies may be
posted separately.
When the BA deems an organization in violation of this OCoC, the BA
will, at its sole discretion, determine what action to take. The BA
will decide what type, degree, and duration of corrective action is
needed, if any, before a violating organization can be considered for
membership (if it was not already a member) or can have its membership
reinstated (if it was a member and the BA canceled its membership due
to the violation).
In practice, the BA's first approach will be to start a conversation,
with punitive enforcement used only as a last resort. Violations
often turn out to be unintentional and swiftly correctable with all
parties acting in good faith.

View File

@ -1,5 +1,10 @@
WebAssembly Micro Runtime
=========================
**A [Bytecode Alliance][BA] project**
[BA]: https://bytecodealliance.org/
WebAssembly Micro Runtime (WAMR) is a standalone WebAssembly (WASM) runtime with small footprint. It includes a few parts as below:
- A WebAssembly VM core (namely iwasm)
- The supporting API's for the WASM applications

29
SECURITY.md Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
# Security Policy
Building secure foundations for software development is at the core of what we do in the Bytecode Alliance. Contributions of external security researchers are a vital part of that.
## Scope
If you believe you've found a security issue in any website, service, or software owned or operated by the Bytecode Alliance, we encourage you to notify us.
## How to Submit a Report
To submit a vulnerability report to the Bytecode Alliance, please contact us at [security@bytecodealliance.org](mailto:security@bytecodealliance.org). Your submission will be reviewed and validated by a member of our security team.
## Safe Harbor
The Bytecode Alliance supports safe harbor for security researchers who:
* Make a good faith effort to avoid privacy violations, destruction of data, and interruption or degradation of our services.
* Only interact with accounts you own or with explicit permission of the account holder. If you do encounter Personally Identifiable Information (PII) contact us immediately, do not proceed with access, and immediately purge any local information.
* Provide us with a reasonable amount of time to resolve vulnerabilities prior to any disclosure to the public or a third-party.
We will consider activities conducted consistent with this policy to constitute "authorized" conduct and will not pursue civil action or initiate a complaint to law enforcement. We will help to the extent we can if legal action is initiated by a third party against you.
Please submit a report to us before engaging in conduct that may be inconsistent with or unaddressed by this policy.
## Preferences
* Please provide detailed reports with reproducible steps and a clearly defined impact.
* Submit one vulnerability per report.
* Social engineering (e.g. phishing, vishing, smishing) is prohibited.